A beauty pageant hosted at a tranquil spa resort on a South Pacific island descended into a storm after the winning model was controversially snatched of her crown.
As the competition drew to a climax on Friday night, Manshika Prasad, 24, was crowned Miss Fiji at the Pearl Resort & Spa after securing her title with a 4-3 vote from pageant judges.
But it was at this point that things turned really ugly, according to one judge who witnessed a conspiracy unfold in front of their eyes.
Prasads celebrations were quickly cut short as she was dethroned by one of her rivals, Nadine Roberts - a 30-year-old model and property developer from Sydney, Australia.
Miss Universe Fiji (MUF) was forced to select a new queen because of a controversial decision by judges, which saw Prasad incorrectly awarded the crown.
Prasad will no longer be travelling to Mexico to compete for the Miss Universe title in November after officials claimed the contestant was declared winner in a rigged vote favouring a Fiji Indian winner because it would financially benefit the event manager.
A heartbroken Prasad has said she will be taking a break from social media and claimed that there was so much the public did not know about.
Roberts has also spoken out since taking the throne, saying we are all impacted by this and thanking MUF for its swift action on the matter.
Manshika Prasad, 24, (centre) was crowned Miss Fiji on August 30 after securing her title with a 4-3 vote from pageant judges. But the Miss Universe Fiji (MUF) competition, in a statement reviewed by MailOnline, has said a controversial decision by judges at the finalists event resulted in Prasad being incorrectly awarded the crown
Officials alleged that correct procedures were not followed during the pageant and that Prasad (pictured) had been declared winner in a rigged vote favouring a Fiji Indian winner because it would financially benefit the event manager
Prasad, a MBA student, was voted the majority winner of the Miss Fiji title by a panel of seven judges, including one who was a representative from Lux Property Bali, the company that bought the licence to hold the pageant, FBC News Fiji reported.
The other six judges were reportedly all independently confirmed and originally presented on the official pageant website.
But the MUF organization later said Prasad was incorrectly awarded the winner and instead proclaimed Roberts as Miss Fiji 2024.
MUF alleged the organiser had not followed correct procedures when it allegedly failed to count the licensee vote and consult them in the event of the tie.
In its statement, which was reviewed by MailOnline, MUF stated the contracted organiser, Grant Dwyer, wanted a Fiji Indian winner to leverage potential Global Business deals.
The organisation alleged that Dwyer deliberately failed to count the licensee vote to ensure only the Fiji Indian contestant would win by the judges, against a local Fiji non Indian contestant winning.
MUF stated that there were a total of eight votes that should have been counted, seven from the panel judges - which included a local Lux Property representative - and one from the licensee.
The contracted organiser failed to count the licensee vote, and failed to then consult in the event of a tie, who has the determining vote to decide who is best to represent MUF at the finals in Mexico, in November later this year, the statement continued.
Despite concerns raised on the night by the local licensee representative that was in attendance, that the Licensee vote must be counted, and then consulted in the event of a tie, to then decide on the winner.
The contracted organiser rushed to announce their favourite candidate as the winner on the night, creating unnecessary confusion and controversy.
Dwyer, however, has disputed the claim, alleging Prasad was judged fairly and that her crowning holds substance.
MUF then revealed that runner-up Nadine Roberts (pictured) - a 30-year-old model and property developer from Sydney, Australia - will compete for the Miss Universe title as Miss Fiji in Mexico in November
Prasad (front, right) is pictured after having been crowned Miss Universe Fiji. Roberts (left) is pictured in her runners-up sash
But the MUF organization later said Prasad was incorrectly awarded the winner and instead proclaimed Roberts (pictured) as Miss Fiji 2024
Some of the judges have also questioned the organisations decision, claiming that Prasad was the clear winner in the contest.
The panel were asked to write down the name of who they thought should be crowned Miss Fiji 2024 as the pageant came to a close on Friday, August 30.
Jennifer Chan, an US-based TV host, style and beauty expert who was one of the judges, told the BBC that she was 100 per cent confident that Prasad was the best candidate to represent Fiji in the Miss Universe competition.
She also argued that it is just gross to even bring up race in determining the competition winner and claims it was never, ever once uttered amongst any of the judges.
Chan, recalling the final night of the competition, said: By this stage, Manshika was the clear winner. Not only based on what she presented on stage but also how she interacted with the other girls, how she photographed, how she modelled.
But as Prasad took to the stage, wearing her sparkling tiara, after being crowned the judges could tell something was wrong, Chan alleges.
She recalled how Roberts, who was stood on Prasads right in her runners-up sash, was seething at the results.
Chan claims she asked her self how could someone feel so entitled to win? and assumed that Roberts, a seasoned pageant contestant, should know that when it comes to competitions you win some, you lose some.
She also thought it was strange that on Saturday, despite Prasad taking a celebratory boat trip with the judges, there had been no official confirmation of her victory.
Additionally, judge Riri Febriani, who had represented Lux Projects, was absent from the trip.
I remember thinking that was odd, Melissa White, who was one of the competition judges and had shared a room with Febriani, told the broadcaster. But she just said she had lots of work to do and she needed to talk to her boss.
One judge has alleged that she was 100 per cent confident that Prasad, pictured during her crowning, was the best candidate to represent Fiji in the Miss Universe competition
The judge also recalled how Roberts (pictured) was seething at the results came in and Prasad was crowned Miss Fiji
Febriani reportedly claimed she couldnt go on the trip because she needed rest, but White alleges she was fielding phone calls and messages from a man called Jamie.
White further alleged that Jamie was actually Australian businessman Jamie McIntyre, who has been married to Roberts since 2022.
McIntyre in 2016 was banned from doing business in Australia for a decade due to his involvement in a property investment scheme that cost investors more than A$7million (£3.6million or $4.7million USD).
Despite Febriani having been a judge on the panel, Lux Projects was allegedly unhappy with the vote and two days after the crowning, in a press release, said that Dwyer had failed to count the vote it should get the licensee.
The firm said it would have voted for Roberts, bringing the count to tie of 4-4. It also alleged that as the licensee it had the determining vote, which would make Roberts the winner of the contest.
It is also alleged that McIntyre had been on the phone during calls between Roberts and Dwyer.
Never at any point were we told about an eighth judge or any kind of absentee judge, Chan told the BBC. It wasnt on the website, it wasnt anywhere. Besides, how can you vote on a contest if youre not even there?
Representatives for McIntyre, in a statement to MailOnline, claimed the allegations that he was involved in the judging controversy were part of a smear campaign.
Despite the evidence clearly showing he isnt the licensee holder of Miss Universe Fiji, Im simply a shareholder in a associated company that they deliberately try to link to be deceptive, and adding a link by over a previous relationship, creating a nonsensical conspiracy theory, McIntyre said through his reps.
But lets assume I was. If I was the licensee, the licensee is fully entitled to appoint all judges. If I wanted to rig the result, why wouldnt I simply have appointed all 8 judges, plus ensure they were all family, friends, associates or business partners to ensure an outcome. Yet I didnt. I wasnt involved. Wasnt a judge, wasnt there and quite frankly have more important things to do then be judging a Miss Universe Pageant let alone own Miss Universe.
But we all know who did appoint the judges, who ensured they were all his family, friends, associates or business partners and continually told the licensee, trust me, it will be all done fairly.
BBC alleges the Miss Universe Organisation (MUO) is extremely unhappy with the events in Fiji and, after having established the facts, worked hard to reinstate Ms Prasad (pictured on August 30) as the islands queen
The mutli-million-dollar Miss Universe Organisation (MUO) operates under a franchise system, meaning a competitions must buy a licence that enables them to use the firms branding and sell tickets to Miss Universe branded events.
The licences are expensive, so it is often hard for small countries to find a person or company willing to fund the licence for a national pageant. This expense is understood to be the reason why Fiji has not entered a Miss Universe contestant in 43 years.
The MUO did not respond to the BBCs request for comment, but the broadcaster alleges the firm is extremely unhappy with the events in Fiji and, after having established the facts, worked hard to reinstate Ms Prasad as the islands queen.
MailOnline has approached MUF, the MUO, Prasad and Roberts for comment.